Google co-founder Sergey Brin says that Chrome OS and Android are likely to merge at some point, say reports. Meanwhile, we sample the response to Chrome OS from across the Googleverse, and explore whether calling the cloud-oriented, Linux-based OS "underwhelming" is a diss or a kiss.
Shortly after last week's unveiling of Chrome OS, Google co-founder Sergey Brin was quoted by CNET as telling reporters in an informal chat after the event that "Android and Chrome will likely converge over time." Brin was also said to have noted that the common Linux and WebKit code present in both platforms suggested that merger might be feasible.
The key obstacle to such a merger, aside from differences in screen size and usage scenarios, would appear to be the fact that Android uses native applications that are downloaded and stored locally while Chrome OS, which will not run Android apps, is said to support only web-based software. However, Android apps could conceivably be ported to a web-based approach.
Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin (right) skate onto stage at original HTC G1 Android announcement in September 2008
After Google originally announced Chrome OS last July, executives such as CEO Eric Schmidt and Android chief Andy Rubin tried to downplay any potential overlap between Android and Chrome OS, suggesting that Android might work on smaller netbooks, but that most netbooks, and potentially desktop systems were better off with Chrome OS. A few Android netbooks and smartbooks have been announced, although the most notable example, Acer's Aspire One AOD250-1613 uses Android as sort of a glorified fast-boot companion to Windows. Some predicted at the time that Chrome OS would destroy Android's momentum, yet Android has continued to storm the smartphone world, and the Linux-based mobile OS is also increasingly seen as a viable option for general embedded devices ranging from e-book readers to industrial equipment displays.
Chrome OS aftermath: Fear, loathing, and the power of "underwhelming"
In recent days, hackers have compiled bootable images of Google's Chrome OS, and we gave the early code a test spin on VirtualBox, finding it to be several steps beyond vaporware. Meanwhile, technology pundits around the world have let fly about the novel operating system, with most, it seems, taking a skeptical slant.
Chrome OS running on VirtualBox
Over at our sister publication, eWEEK Don Reisinger previewed the Chrome OS event last week with a story called "10 Reasons Why Microsoft Should Fear Chrome OS." Some of the reasons why Steve Ballmer might be clutching his sheets include the fact that Chrome OS is backed by fast-rising tech giant Google, a company that dominates the web and "has proven time and again that it understands what consumers really want from software," writes Resinger.
In addition, Google has wisely started off with the hottest segment in computing -- netbooks -- while preparing to push Chrome OS up into the notebook/desktop space. Meanwhile, computer vendors are actively looking for an alternative to Windows, and although Windows 7 might be an improvement on Windows Vista, it "still suffers from security problems, quirks and a level of usability that some users don't find appealing enough," adds Reisinger.
After the event, however, Reisinger posted a more skeptical "10 Things Missing From Google Chrome OS." Key omissions are said to include lack of local storage support, "powerful" software, clear-cut security policy, and support for other browsers. He also critiques the OS for its lack of offline capabilities, and the inability to download it to any standard PC hardware.
Also on eWEEK, Clint Boulton followed up on his original coverage of Chrome OS last week with a story quoting IDC analyst Al Hilwa as saying that it will take 10 years before the operating system "begins to see serious enterprise adoption," and even then at only about five percent of the market.
Enterprises will be hesitant to turn over control of software updates entirely to Google, suggests Hilwa. "You'll still have occasionally a [cloud-based] update that comes in and it will screw up something," Hilwa is quoted as saying. "Enterprises don't want to see that kind of thing."
Hilwa also says that netbook consumers might balk at the inability to download local (as opposed to web-based) apps. He then appears to suggest that while netbook makers will experiment with Chrome OS, the primary motivation might be to use it as a bargaining chip to gain better terms from Microsoft on Windows installs.
A fatal attraction to Linux?
This critique was mild, however, compared to one from ComputerWorld's Randall Kennedy, entitled: "Opinion: Why Chrome OS will fail -- big time." Kennedy starts off with what many observers believe to one of Chrome OS' strengths: its Linux foundation. Noting that Chrome OS "inherits that platform's many warts, including spotty hardware compatibility," he goes on to state, "From power management to display support, Linux has long been a minefield of buggy code and half-baked device driver implementations."
Kennedy then complains that basing Chrome OS on a web interface is another "fatal flaw," and dismisses Google's admittedly alpha-stage UI by saying that it's "derivative." (Note from the peanut gallery: although we imagine something more imaginative will arrive in the final UI a year from now, perhaps along the lines of Moblin v2.0's social networking-oriented interface, what's wrong with keeping it simple and familiar?)
Kennedy concludes with a more defensible complaint: the platform appears to lack flexibility. In particular, he notes the fact that users are limited to web-based applications, that the platform does not support hard drives, and it will only be available on specific pre-approved netbook designs. (He blames the latter approach on the flakiness of Linux, of course.)
In short, Google Chrome OS "assumes that the world is ready to give up the traditional personal computing paradigm and live full time in the cloud," writes Kennedy. "In reality, most users prefer a hybrid existence, with some of their data and applications stored locally, and others -- typically the freebies, like Gmail -- hosted online."
There are some supporters of the early Chrome OS, however. Most of these seem to come from the open source community, although few such observers seemed willing to fully embrace the Google beast, perhaps fearing another Microsoft in the making.
'Unimpressive' is a compliment
Over at PCWorld, Robert Strohmeyer wrote one of the more reasonable pro-Chrome assessments, suggesting that Chrome OS critics are missing the point when they call it unimpressive or underwhelming. "For Chrome OS, 'unimpressive' is practically a compliment," he writes. "If you're not impressed with the operating system, that means it's doing what it's supposed to be doing, which is getting out of your way so you can get on with your life."
According to Strohmeyer, having an underwhelming -- and undemanding -- OS is precisely what most users want today. Strohmeyer harkens back to 1998 when, "I distinctly recall several colleagues scoffing at the simplicity of Google's home page at the time," he writes. "Where were the news articles? The stock tickers? The pictures of celebrities? Why would anyone want a home page consisting of nothing but a search engine? Yet Google's pundit-defying search tool quickly became the home page of choice for millions of users worldwide."
Strohmeyer goes on to argue that cloud services are clearly emerging as the computing model for the future, and that WiFi and 3G wireless access is becoming nearly ubiquitous -- both trends that tie into Google's Chrome OS strategy. He also notes that there are fewer and fewer software categories where competent web-based apps are unavailable. Even in video editing, he points to contenders like JayCut as offering a suitable toolset for most users.
Strohmeyer suggests that this may not be the last browser-based OS that we'll see. While he expects that traditional OSes will continue to dominate for many years, "this minimal-OS model could very well prove to be a whole new market for them, too, providing useful alternatives to the sluggish, bloated platforms that have dominated the computing world for far too long."
YouTube video of Google's Chrome OS presentation
Availability
The CNET story on Sergey Brin's comments about Chrome OS and Android potentially merging may be found here.
The eWEEK story on why Microsoft should fear Chrome OS may be found here, and the follow-up on what's missing from Chrome OS should be here.
eWEEK's story on IDC's Chrome OS take may be found here.
The ComputerWorld story on Chrome OS flaws may be found here, and the PCWorld story on its understated charms may be found here.
NOTE: Please post your comments regarding our articles using the above link. Be sure to use this article's title as the "Subject" in your posts. Before you create a new thread, please check to see if a discussion thread is already running on the article you plan to comment on. Thanks!
Approaching the Linux Desktop
The purpose of this paper is to help organizations evaluate the Linux desktop against their own enterprise needs and discover what benefits the Linux desktop might bring to their organizations.
Migrating To Linux: Application Challenges and Solutions
Several solutions exist to help organizations migrate in an orderly fashion from Windows to Linux desktops. This paper establishes the characteristics of an ideal cross-platform solution and reviews these alternatives in light of this ideal standard. The paper takes a closer look at the pros and cons of various solutions and outlines the business benefits that can be achieved.
Top 5 Strategies for Managing Linux
Despite continuous evolution in the manageability of Linux, a 2006 survey cited manageability concerns as a top reason why organizations are hesitating to adopt Linux. Levanta believes Linux can be as manageable, if not more so, than other operating systems by following key strategies. These strategic recommendations were developed from experiences in numerous customer environments, both large and small.
Why Choose Novell for Linux?
This paper outlines the benefits of switching to the Linux platform and choosing Novell as a high-performance, enterprise solution.
Enterprise Linux Selection Guide
Considering moving your enterprise to the Linux operating system? Since there are so many similar versions, choosing the right one can be tough. This paper offers a clear process to help you make an informed decision and get the features, support, and cost that are right for your business and technical needs.
Overcoming Challenges in Managing Linux
Levanta has created a new administration model with innovative technology that breaks down the barriers to making the most of Linux systems. This paper will provide an in-depth look at the workings of Levanta’s product, the first Linux appliance of its kind.
SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 for Retail Businesses
Discover why major retailers have switched to SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop in the back office. SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 is a low-cost desktop that offers a complete set of productivity applications and interoperates seamlessly with the other Windows, Macintosh and UNIX desktops in your store.
Moving to a Linux Desktop
Migrating from Windows to Linux on the desktop can be a substantial undertaking because it has the potential for touching -- and perhaps disrupting -- every user in your organization. Unlike a data center (server and infrastructure) migration that is largely transparent to users, the cultural and administrative transitions and environment readiness required to support a Linux desktop migration are extensive.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin says that Chrome OS and Android are likely to merge at some point, say reports. Meanwhile, we sample the response to Chrome OS from across the Googleverse, and explore whether calling the cloud-oriented, Linux-based OS "underwhelming" is a diss or a kiss.
news feed
